Нейроэтика: этика нейронауки в современном контексте
Нейроэтика: этика нейронауки в современном контексте
Аннотация
Код статьи
S0236-20070000616-8-1
Тип публикации
Статья
Статус публикации
Опубликовано
Номер
Страницы
5-20
Аннотация
Нейроэтика лежит на пересечении биоэтики и нейронауки. Длящееся уже не один век обсуждение этических проблем сознания и поведения получило в рамках этой недавно сформировавшейся области новое звучание. В широком смысле нейроэтика анализирует этические, правовые, политические и социальные проблемы нейронауки, включая проблемы проведения научных исследований в этой области. Достижения нейронауки ставят под вопрос давно сложившиеся представления человека о своей самости и своих отношениях с обществом. Нейронаука генерирует инновации в клинической медицине, имеющие и нетерапевтическое применение и выходящие далеко за традиционные границы медицинской деятельности. Экспоненциальный рост междисциплинарных исследований, коммерциализация когнитивных разделов нейронауки, настоятельные требования наладить обучение этике, а также значение, которое сегодня приобретает понимание проблем науки обществом, - все это наглядно показывает важность ней-роэтики для нейронауки.
Ключевые слова
НЕЙРОЭТИКА, NEUROETHICS, НЕЙРОНАУКА, NEUROSCIENCE, ЭТИКА НАУКИ, СОЦИАЛЬНЫЕ ПОСЛЕДСТВИЯ РАЗВИТИЯ НАУКИ, ETHICAL ISSUES OF SCIENCE, SOCIAN IMLICATIONS OF SCIENTIFIC INNOVATIONS
Классификатор
Дата публикации
01.12.2015
Всего подписок
1
Всего просмотров
1032
Оценка читателей
0.0 (0 голосов)
Цитировать Скачать pdf
1

Библиография



Дополнительные библиографические источники и материалы

1. Bacon CMeditationes Sacrae. De Haeresibus. 1597
2. Bartels A., Zeki S. The neural correlates of maternal and romantic love// NeuroImage/ 2004. v. 21/ P.1155- 1166. [PubMed: 15006682]
3. Bird S.J. Communicating scientific advice to the public. The IPTS Report 72. 2003. Accessed 12 January 2006 http://www.jrc.es/home/report/eng-lish/articles/vol72/SCI3E726.htm
4. Bird S.J. Neuroethics // Encyclopedia of Science, Technology and Ethics. /Ed. by C. Mitcham. Macmillan Reference. 2005. P. 1310-1316.
5. Cacioppo J.T.; Berntson G.G. Social Neuroscience. Psychology Press. 2005.
6. Canli T. et al. Amygdala response to happy faces as a function of extra-version // Science. 2002. V. 296. P. 2191. [PubMed: 12077407]
7. Chatterjee A. Cosmetic Neurology: the controversy over enhancing movement, mentation, and mood // Neurology. 2004. v.63:968-974. [PubMed: 15452285].
8. Cho M.K. Conflicts of interest in magnetic resonance imaging: issues in clinical practice and research // Top. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2002. 13. P. 73-78. [PubMed: 12055451]
9. Chorover S.L. From Genesis to Genocide. MIT Press. 1979.
10. Congress of the US, Office of Technology Assessment. Impacts of uro-science. 1984. http://www.wws.princeton.edu/ota/ns20/year_f.html
11. Couturier J.L. Efficacy of rapid-rate repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis // J. Psychiatry Neurosci 2005. V. 30. P. 83-90. [PubMed: 15798783]
12. Cummings J.L. Treatment of Alzheimer's disease: current and future therapeutic approaches // Rev. Neurol. Dis 2004. N 1. P 60-69. [PubMed: 16400259]
13. Damasio A.R. The neural basis of social behavior: ethical implications // Marcus S.J., ed. Neuroethics: Mapping the Field. The Dana Foundation Press. 2002. P. 14-19.
14. Decety J. et al. The neural bases of cooperation and competition: An fMRI investigation // NeuroImage. 2004. V. 23. P. 744-751. [PubMed: 15488424]
15. Diefenbach G.J. et al. Portrayal of lobotomy in the popular press: 1935-1960 // J. Hist. Neurosci. 1999. N 8. P. 60-69. [PubMed: 11624138]
16. Evers K. Perspectives on memory manipulation: Using beta-blockers to cure post-traumatic stress disorder // Camb. Q. Healthc. Ethics.
17. Farah M.J. et al. Neurocognitive enhancement: what can we do and what should we do? // Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2004. V.5. P. 421-425. [PubMed: 15100724]
18. Farah M.J. Wolpe P.R. Neuroethics: toward broader discussion // Hastings Cent. Rep. 2004. V. 34. P. 35-45. [PubMed: 15281725]
19. Foster K.R. Engineering the brain // Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy/ Ed. by J. Illes. Oxford University Press. 2006. P. 185-199.
20. Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of depression // J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 2005. V. 30. P. 434-435. [PubMed: 16327880]
21. Garrett J.M, Bird S.J. Ethical issues in communicating science // Sci. Eng. Ethics. 2000. V.6 P. 435-442. [PubMed: 11228768]
22. Gaylin W. et al. Violence and the Politics of Research. Plenum Press, 1981.
23. Greene J.D. et al. An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment // Science. 2001. V. 293. P. 2105-2108. [PubMed: 11557895]
24. Hariri A.R. Weinberger DR. Imaging genomics. // Br. Med. Bull. 2003. V. 65. P. 259-270. [PubMed: 12697630]
25. Illes J. et al. Advertising, patient decision-making, and self-referral to CT and MR imaging // Arch. Intern. Med. 2004. V. 164. P. 2415-2419. [PubMed: 15596630]
26. Illes J. et al. ELSI issues in advanced neuroimaging // Am. J. Bioeth 200. V. 6. P. W24-W31. [PubMed: 16500831]
27. Illes J. et al. From neuroimaging to neuroethics // Nat. Neurosci 2003. V. 6. P. 205. [PubMed: 12601375]
28. Illes J. et al. Incidental findings in brain imaging research // Science. 2006. V. 311. P. 783-784. [PubMed: 16469905]
29. Illes J. et al. Neuroethics: International perspectives on engaging the public // Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2005. V. 6. P. 977-982. [PubMed: 16340957]
30. Illes J, Kirschen M.P. New prospects and ethical challenges for neu-roimaging within and outside the health care system // Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2003. V. 24. P. 1932-1934. [PubMed: 14625212]
31. Illes J. Racine E. Imaging or imagining? A neuroethics challenge informed by genetics // Am. J. Bioeth. 2005. V. 5. P. 5-18. [PubMed: 16036688]
32. Illes J. Cerebrum: Special Issue on Neuroethics. The Dana Foundation Press. 2004. P. 73-80.
33. Illes J. et al. A picture is worth 1000 words, but which 1000?// Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice, Policy / Ed.by. J. Illes Oxford University Press. 2006. P. 149-168.
34. Jackson F.L.C. Tuskegee Experiment // Encyclopedia of Science, Technology, and Ethics/Ы. by C. Mitcham. Macmillan Reference. 2005. P. 1986-1988.
35. Keveles D.J. In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity. Alfred Knopf. 1985.
36. Kozel F.A. et al. Detecting deception using functional magnetic resonance imaging // Biol. Psychiatry. 2005. V.58. P. 605-613. [PubMed: 16185668]
37. Lifton, R. The Nazi Doctors: Medical Killings and the Psychology of Genocide. Basic Books. 2000.
38. Marcus S. ed. Neuroethics: Mapping the Field. The Dana Foundation Press. 2002.
39. Mashour G.A. et al. Psychosurgery: past, present, and future // Brain Res. Rev. 2005. V. 48. P. 409-419. [PubMed: 15914249]
40. Meyer-Lindenberg A. et al. Neural mechanisms of genetic risk for impulsivity and violence in humans // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 2006. V. 103. P. 6269-6274. [PubMed: 16569698]
41. Moll J. et al. Functional networks in emotional and nonmoral social judgments. NeuroImage. 2002. V. 16. P. 696-703. [PubMed: 12169253]
42. Moll J. et al. The neural correlates of moral sensitivity: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of basic and moral emotions // J. Neurosci 2002. V.22. P. 2730-2736. [PubMed: 11923438]
43. Morse S.J. Moral and legal responsibility and the new neuroscience // Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy. Oxford University Press. 2006. P. 33-50.
44. Moseley M. et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of cognitive function // Brain Cogn. 2002. V. 50. P. 396-413. [PubMed: 12480486]
45. Muller-Hill B. Murderous Science: Elimination by Scientific Selection of Jews, Gypsies, and Others, Germany 1933-1945. Oxford University Press. 1988.
46. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Government Printing Office. 1978.
47. PfaffD.W. ed. Ethical Questions in Brain and Behavior: Problems and Opportunities. Springer-Verlag. 1983.
48. Pitman R.K. et al. Pilot study of secondary prevention of posttraumatic stress disorder with propranolol // Biol. Psychiatry. 2002. V. 51. P. 189-192. [PubMed: 11822998]
49. Pontius A.A. Neuroethics vs neurophysiologically and neuropsychologi-cally uninformed influences in child-rearing and education // Psychol. Rep. 1993. P. 72:451-458. [PubMed: 8488227]
50. Potter V.R. Bioethics: Bridge to the Future. Prentice-Hall; 1971.
51. Racine E. et al. Internet marketing of neuroproducts: New practices and healthcare policy challenges // Camb. Q. Healthc. Ethics.
52. Ricard M., Thuan T.X. The Quantum and the Lotus: A Journey to the Frontiers Where Science and Buddhism Meet Three Rivers. Three Rivers Press. 2001.
53. Roskies A. Neuroethics for the new millennium // Neuron. 2002. V. 35. P. 21-23. [PubMed: 12123605]
54. Schacter D.L et al. Memory, consciousness and neuroimaging // Philos. Trans. R. Soc. L., 1998. P. 1861-1978. [PubMed: 9854258]
55. Schaffner K.F. Neuroethics: reductionism, emergence, and decision-making capacities // Neuroethics: Mapping the Fiel/Ed. by S.J. Marcus. The Dana Foundation Press. 2002. P. 27-33.
56. Schiff N.D. et al. MRI reveals large-scale network activation in minimally conscious patients // Neurology 2005;64:514-523. [PubMed: 15699384]
57. Valenstein E.S. Great and Desperate Cures: The Rise and Decline of Py-schosurgery and Other Radical Treatments for Mental Illness. Basic Books. 1986.
58. Valenstein E.S. ed. The Psychosurgery Debate. W.H. Freeman. 1980.
59. Vincent J-D. In Proceedings. Third Session. International Bioethics Committee of UNESCO; 1995. Ethics and neurosciences. P. 1-8.
60. Zimmer C. Soul Made Flesh: The Discovery of the Brain - and How it Changed the World. Free Press. 2004.

Комментарии

Сообщения не найдены

Написать отзыв
Перевести