The word becoming the Home of existence
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
The word becoming the Home of existence
Annotation
PII
S0236-20070000616-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Edition
Pages
5-19
Abstract
The attempt is made to disclose and develop G.G. Spet's point that the Word constitutes the primary and the main principle of Human cognition. The baby since the very birth appears in the atmosphere (spiritosphere, cognitosphere, semiosphere) of the Word. It envelops the baby, penetrates the soul becoming the internal form of the images, motions, acts, states, emotions. Becoming the external form, the Word is being preserved in the internal form of the acts, images, emotions or the programs of their actualization, turns into the inner non verbal Word. The agenda of heterogeneity and heterogenesis of the word, the image and the act is considered in the perspective of cultural and historical psychology as well as psychology of creativity.
Keywords
WORD, IMAGE, HETEROGENEITY, UNDERSTANDING, INTELLIGIBLE INTUITION, SUBJECT, PERSONALITY, CREATIVITY, ACT, HETEROGENESIS
Date of publication
01.10.2012
Number of purchasers
0
Views
801
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Rabinovich V.L. Slovo evangelista Ioanna v uchitel'skoj kul'ture srednevekov'ya (Opyt kommentariya)//Chelovek v sisteme nauk. M., 1989. S. 143-145. 
2. Averintsev S.S. Sobr. soch. Sofiya -Logos -Slovar'. M., 2006. S. 825.
3. Zinchenko V.P. Slovo sil'nee gosudarstva//Al'ter-Ehgo. 1992. №1.
4. Bibikhin V.V. Grammatika poehzii. M., 2009. S. 376.
5. Bibikhin V.V. Grammatika poehzii. M., 2009. S. 369.
6. Shpet G.G. Iskusstvo kak vid znaniya. Izbr. trudy. M., 2007. S. 196-197.
7. Gumbol'dt V. Yazyk i filosofiya kul'tury. M., 1985. S. 224.
8. Kandinskij V.V. O dukhovnom v iskusstve. M., 1992. S. 99.
9. Shpet G.G. Ukaz. soch. S. 207.
10. Paskal' B. Mysli. Aforizmy. M., 2011. S. 113.
11. Mamardashvili M.K. Soznanie i tsivilizatsiya. M., 2004. S. 15.
12. Florenskij P.A. U vodorazdelov mysli. T. 2. M., 1990. S. 271.
13. Tresmontan K. Razum//Stranitsy. 1996. № 4.
14. Mamardashvili M.K. Ukaz. soch. S. 59-60.
15. Mamardashvili M.K. Ukaz. soch. S. 15-16.
16. Shpet G.G. Mysl' i slovo. Izbr. trudy. M., 2005. S. 173.
17. Khajdegger M. Chto zovetsya myshleniem? M., 2007. S. 19-21.
18. Bibikhin V.V. Mir. SPb., 2007.
19. Mamardashvili M.K. Ukaz. soch. S. 13.
20. Khajdegger M. Ukaz. soch. S. 213.
21. Bakhtin M.M. Sobr. soch. T. 5. M., 1997. S. 135.
22. Vygotskij L.S. Sobr. soch. T. 6. M., 1984. S. 58.
23. Bakhtin M.M. Sobr. soch. T. 1. M., 2003. S. 29.
24. Shpet G.G. Iskusstvo kak vid znaniya. S. 218, 219.
25. Mamardashvili M.K. Ukaz. soch. S. 114.
26. Averintsev S.S. Ukaz. soch. S. 816.
27. Shpet G.G. Iskusstvo kak vid znaniya. S. 191.
28. Bibikhin V.V. Grammatika poehzii. S. 284.
29. Petrovskaya E.V. Teoriya obraza. M., 2011. S. 149-150.
30. Zinchenko V.P. Soznanie i tvorcheskij akt. M., 2011.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate