Везде
"Genetization" of society: technologies and interests
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
"Genetization" of society: technologies and interests
Annotation
PII
S0236-20070000600-1-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Elena Bogomyagkova 
Edition
Issue 6
Pages
45-58
Abstract
The article deals with the social consequences of "genetization" of society resulting from the proliferation of biotechnologies and decoding of the human genome. First, the issues of freedom of choice, human rights, obligations and individual responsibility are considered. Second, the problems of genetic discrimination are in the focus of our interest. Thirdly, we talk about the formation of communities, new forms of group cohesion and social activism, based on genetic and biological identities.
Keywords
BIOTECHNOLOGY, HUMAN GENOME, SOCIAL INEQUALITY, GENETIC CITIZENSHIP, HUMAN RIGHTS, GENETIC RISK, "GENETIZATION", GENETIC RESPONSIBILITY
Date of publication
01.12.2016
Number of purchasers
1
Views
1302
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

    

  1. Varkhotov T.A., Gavrilenko S.M., Stambol'skij D.V. i dr. Zadachi sotsial'no-gumanitarnogo soprovozhdeniya sozdaniya natsional'nogo banka-depozitariya biomaterialov v Rossii // Vopr. filosofii. 2016. № 3. S. 124-138.
    2. 

  2. Gol'man E.A. Novoe ponimanie zdorov'ya v politike i povsednevnosti: istoki, aktual'nye napravleniya problematizatsii // Zhurn. issled. sots. politiki. 2014. T. 12, № 4. S. 509-522.
    3. 

  3. Dimitrova I. Detorozhdenie i otvetstvennost': sluchaj perinatal'noj diagnostiki v Bolgarii // Zhurn. issled. sots. politiki. 2014. T. 12, № 3. S. 455-466.
    4. 

  4. Kiyaschenko L.P., Grebenschikova E.G.Molekulyarnyj vek - "okraina vechnosti"? // Chelovek. 2014. № 3. S. 127-137.
    5. 

  5. Lomonosova M.V., Bogomyagkova E.S. Reproduktivnye prava cheloveka i vspomogatel'nye reproduktivnye tekhnologii: novye formy i vidy neravenstva // Ehkon. strategii. 2015. № 9. S. 90-97.
    6. 

  6. Makhiyanova E.B. Proekt "genom Cheloveka": nauchno-administrativnye aspekty // Chelovek. 2012. № 1. S. 64-67.
    7. 

  7. Na ostrie zhizni. Novosti bioehtiki // Chelovek. 2010. № 2. S. 33.
    8. 

  8. Plokhaya nasledstvennost': Chto nuzhno znat' o geneticheskoj diskriminatsii. URL: http://www.furfur.me/furfur/changes/changes/216899-dna (data obrascheniya 15.07.2016).
    9. 

  9. Reznichenko L.A. Dolgij spor o zaschite ehmbrionov // Chelovek. 2011. № 3. S. 137-138.
    10. 

  10. Ugarova A. Geneticheskoe testirovanie: kontrol' nad zhizn'yu ili illyuziya? Rets. na kn. Hesse-Biber S. (2014). Waiting for Cancer to Come: Women's Experiences with Genetic Testing and Medical Decision Making for Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University of Michigan Press // Sotsiologiya vlasti. 2016. № 1. S. 279-285.
    11. 

  11. Frolov I.T. Osobennosti nauchno-tekhnicheskoj revolyutsii v "vek biologii" i problema Cheloveka (tez. dokl.) // Chelovek. 2014. № 4. S. 37-42.
    12. 

  12. Yudin B.G. Biopolitika uluchsheniya cheloveka // Rabochie tetradi po bioehtike. Vyp. 20: Gumanitarnyj analiz biotekhnologicheskikh proektov "uluchsheniya" cheloveka: sb. nauch. st. / pod red. B.G. Yudina. M.: Izd-vo Mos. gumanitar. un-ta, 2015. S. 91-104.
    13. 

  13. Yudin B.G. Chelovek kak ob'ekt tekhnologicheskikh vozdejstvij // Chelovek. 2011. № 3. S. 5-20.
    14. 

  14. Biopolitics and Utopia: an interdisciplinary reader / ed. by Patricia Stapleton and Andrew Byers. N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
    15. 

  15. Blank R.H., Hines S.M. Biology and political science. L.: Routledge, 2001.
    16. 

  16. China Is Engineering Genius Babies. URL: http://www.vice.com/read/ chinas-taking-over-the-world-with-a-massive-genetic-engineering-program (data obrascheniya 15.07.2016).
    17. 

  17. Governmentality: current issues and future challenges / ed. by U. Broc-kling, S. Krasmann and T. Lemke. N.Y.: Routledge, 2011.
    18. 

  18. Hesse-Biber S. Waiting for Cancer to Come: Women's Experiences with Genetic Testing and Medical Decision Making for Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press, 2014.
    19. 

  19. Hughes B. Disability Activisms: Social Model Stalwarts and Biological Citizens // Disability & Society. 2009. N 24(6). P. 677-688.
    20. 

  20. Kerr A. Genetics and Citizenship // Society. 2003. N 40(6). P. 44-50.
    21. 

  21. Le Breton D. Genetic Fundamentalism or the Cult of the Gene // Body & Society. 2004. N 10 (4). P. 5.
    22. 

  22. Lemke Th. Biopolitics: an advanced introduction. N.Y.; L.: New York Univ. Press, 2011.
    23. 

  23. Lippman A. Led (astray) by Genetic Maps: the Cartography of the Human Genome and Health Care // Social Science and Medicine. 1992. N 35 (12). P. 1469-1476.
    24. 

  24. Lock M. An Anthropology of Biomedicine / M. Lock, V.-K. Nguyen. Oxford: Blackwell, 2010. P. 303-347.
    25. 

  25. Martin E. The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction. Boston: Beacon Press, 2001.
    26. 

  26. Rabinow P. Artificiality and Enlightenment: From Sociobiology to Biosociality, in Essays in the Anthropology of Reason. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, 1996. P. 91-111.
    27. 

  27. Rabinow P. French DNA. Trouble in Purgatory. Chicago; L.: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1999.
    28. 

  28. Rose N. The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 2007.
    29.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate