Везде
Towards (re)establisment of "Cosmization program"
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Towards (re)establisment of "Cosmization program"
Annotation
PII
S0236-20070000616-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
V.M. Khachaturyan 
Edition
Issue 3
Pages
73-85
Abstract
А new, non-mechanistic "cosmization program", that is program of Human being return to cosmic, natural fundamentals of existence, is being under intense development by both scientific and mass culture. Various forms of extra-scientific and non-scientific knowledge are very active in this kind of search and many ideas generated in that domain are very attractive for popular mentality in spite of quite substantiated criticism on the part of science. From the culturologist's point of view marginal zone of culture has an important advantage, that is its inherent orientation towards "The Alternate" in all the variety of its facets. Deviance may be a source of some productive innovations thought, of course, not necessary it is.
Keywords
SCIENCE, SCIENTIFIC CULTURE, MASS CULTURE, PARASCIENCE, PARASCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE, COSMIZATION, POPULAR MENTALITY, EXTRA-SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE
Date of publication
01.06.2013
Number of purchasers
1
Views
1045
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Moiseev N.N. Chelovek vo Vselennoj i na Zemle//Nauka. Obschestvo. Chelovek. M., 2004. S. 322. 
 2. Torchinov E.A. Puti filosofii Vostoka i Zapada: poznanie zapredel'nogo. SPb., 2007. S. 351, 364. Knyazeva E.N., Kurdyumov S.P. Ukaz. soch. S. 236. 
 3. Knyazeva E.N., Kurdyumov S.P. Osnovaniya sinergetiki. Rezhimy s obostreniem, samoorganizatsiya, tempomiry. SPb., 2002. S. 230-231. 
 4. Nalimov V.V. Spontannost' soznaniya. Veroyatnostnaya teoriya smyslov i smyslovaya arkhitektonika lichnosti. M., 2011. S. 326.
 5. Brejden G. Bozhestvennaya matritsa: vremya, prostranstvo i sila soznaniya. M., 2010. S. 230-231, 236-240. 
 6. Pelipenko A.A., Khachaturyan V.M. Kognitivnye osnovy "magicheskogo renessansa" v KhKh v.//Chelovek. 2009. № 3. S. 35-44.
 7. Roszak Th. Were the Wasteland Ends (Politics and Transcendence in Postindustrial Society). N.Y., 1972. P. 250. 
 8. Dehvis Eh. Ukaz. soch. S. 26. 
 9. Latour B. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge (Mass), 1993. 
 10. Dehvis Eh. Tekhnognozis: mif, magiya i mistitsizm v informatsionnuyu ehpokhu. Ekaterinburg, 2007. S. 247. 
 11. Ogurtsov A.P. Kuda vedet filosofiya nauki // Aktual'nye problemy filosofii nauki. M., 2007. S. 97-98. Shvyrev V.S. Osobennosti sovremennogo tipa ratsional'nosti // Tam zhe. S. 49. 
 12. Stepin A.S. Nauka, religiya i sovremennye problemy dialoga kul'tur//Nauka i religiya. S. 22. 
 13. Drury N. The New Age: Searching for the Spiritual Self. L., 2004. P. 8, 12. 
 14. Kagan M.S. Sinergeticheskaya paradigma -dialektika obschego i osobennogo v metodologii poznaniya raznykh sfer bytiya//Sinergeticheskaya paradigma: nelinejnoe myshlenie v nauke i iskusstve. M., 2002. S. 32-34. 
 15. Gusejnov A.A. Idei universalizma i samobytnosti (o vozmozhnosti global'nogo ehtosa)//Nauka i religiya... S. 40. 
 16. Stepin V.S. Strategii teoreticheskogo issledovaniya v ehpokhu postneklassicheskoj nauki. http://www.philoso-phy.ru.library/stepin. 07.html 
 17. Sledzevskij I.V. "Pogranich'e bez granits". Global'naya neopredelennost' mira i ee otrazhenie v znanii i kul'ture//Sotsiokul'turnoe pogranich'e kak fenomen mirovykh i rossijskikh transformatsij: mezhdistsiplinarnoe issledovanie. M., 2008. S. 23. 
 18. Khejzinga J. Homo ludens. V teni zavtrashnego dnya. M., 1992. S. 271, 273. 
 19. Moren Eh. Metod. Priroda Prirody. M., 2005. S. 122. 
 20. Stepin V.S. Filosofiya kak deyatel'nost' po postroeniyu modelej vozmozhnogo buduschego//Virtualistika: ehkzistentsial'nye i ehpistemologicheskie aspekty. M., 2004. S. 12. 
 21. Laslo Eh. Makrosdvig (k ustojchivosti mira kursom peremen). M., 2004. S. 163-164. 
 22. Lotman Yu.M. Semiosfera. SPb., 2004. S. 260, 272.
 23. Stepin V.S. Strategii teoreticheskogo issledovaniya v ehpokhu postneklassicheskoj nauki. http://www. philosophy.ru.library/st epin.07.html 
 24. Filatov V.P. Chelovek i kosmos: novye variatsii staroj temy//Nauka i religiya. Mezhdistsiplinarnyj i kross-kul'turnyj dialog. Nauchnye trudy. M., 2006. S. 222. Kojre A. Ocherki istorii filosofskoj mysli. M., 1985. S. 130-131. 
 25. Deppert V. Mificheskie formy myshleniya v nauke na primere ponyatij prostranstva, vremeni i zakonov prirody//Nauka i religiya.. S. 250, 251. 
 26. Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M., 1990. S. 23-24.
 27. Karpinskaya R.S., Liseev I.K., Ogurtsov A.P. Filosofiya prirody: koehvolyutsionnaya strategiya. M., 1995. S. 290-309. 
 28. Kaznacheev V.P., Spirin E.A. Kosmoplanetarnyj fenomen cheloveka. Problema kompleksnogo izucheniya cheloveka. Novosibirsk, 1991. 
 29. Pelipenko A.A. Postizhenie kul'tury. Ch. 1. Kul'tura i smysl. M., 2012. S. 144-145. 
 30. Fox W. Transpersonal Ecology: "Psychologising" Ecophilosophy//Journal of Transpersonal Psychology. 1990. № 22 (1). P. 59-96. 
 31. Liseev I.K. Sovremennaya biologiya v formirovanii novykh regulyativov kul'tury//Biologiya i kul'tura. M., 2004. S. 43.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate