Field nature of the culture
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Field nature of the culture
Annotation
PII
S0236-20070000616-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Edition
Pages
5-17
Abstract
The culture is considered as a kind of a field formation. Some suggestions are made on the nature and gearing of such a behavior. This makes it possible to explain some similarities of cultural phenomena that are divided by great time intervals and emerge under quite different conditions.
Keywords
CULTURE, CULTURAL SUCCESSION, PSYCHOSPERE
Date of publication
01.04.2014
Number of purchasers
1
Views
1035
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Sergeev D.V. Ontologiya kul'turnogo smysla. Novosibirsk, 2009. S. 95. 
2. Lamberg- Karlovski K., Sablov Dzh.Drevnie tsivilizatsii. Blizhnij Vostok i Mezoamerika. M., 1992. S. 127.
3. Wheeler M. Early India and Pakistan. N.Y., 1959. P.104
4. Penrouz R. Novyj um korolya. M., 2003.
5. Klimov V.A. Lyubischev i problemy organicheskoj formy (1991. № 2).
6. Pelipenko A.A. Genezis smyslovogo prostranstva i ontologii kul'tury. 2002 // Chelovek. 2002. № 2
7. Pelipenko A.A.Kak my ehmigrirovali iz prirody // Chelovek. 2008. № 2.
8. Porshnev B.F.O nachale chelovecheskoj istorii. M.,1974. S. 353
9. Kuchin'skij M.Zhizn' - ehto mysl'.Varshava, 1997.
10. Blaisdell A.P.,Sawa K., Leising K.J.,Waldman M.R.Casual Reasoning in Rats // Science.V. 311. 2006.P. 1020-1022.
11. Gronsenick l.,Clement T.S., Fernald R.D. Fish caninfer social rank by observation alone //Nature. 2007. V. 445.P. 429-432.
12. Karnap R. Filosofskie osnovaniya fiziki. Vvedenie v filosofiyu nauki. M., 1971. S. 39
13. Prigozhin I., Stengers I. Poryadok iz khaosa. M., 2000.S. 165

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate