Везде
Moral person between the duty not to lie and the duty of love of fellow-men
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Moral person between the duty not to lie and the duty of love of fellow-men
Annotation
PII
S0236-20070000616-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Natalia Khafizova 
Edition
Issue 3
Pages
98-110
Abstract
Rethinking a situation discussed in Kant's essay "On a Supposed Right to Lie from Altruistic Motives" the author interprets it as a situation of a choice between abstract duty "do not lie" and particular commitment to rescue a particular person (a friend), even by the price of lying to another one (a wrongdoer). Critical consideration of this situation leads the author to an analysis of the nature of absolutist and non-absolutist approaches in understanding moral imperatives and philosophical premises of Kant's absolutization of the rule "do not lie!", concluded by a normative statement on admissibility of lying as the last resort in opposition to actual evil.
Keywords
ETHICS, KANT, MORAL ABSOLUTISM, RIGHT TO LIE, LOVE OF FELLOW-MEN
Date of publication
01.06.2011
Number of purchasers
1
Views
1010
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Kant I. O mnimom prave lgat' iz chelovekolyubiya//Kant I. Traktaty i pis'ma. M.: Nauka, 1980. S. 293-296. 
 2. Materialy diskussii na ehtu temu opublikovany v zhurnale "Chelovek" (2008. № 3, 4), a zatem v rasshirennom vide v zhurnale "Logos" (2008. № 5). 
 3. Gusejnov A.A. Soslagatel'noe naklonenie morali//Vopr. filosofii. 2001. № 5. S. 27. 
 4. Kant I. Osnovy metafiziki nravstvennosti//Kant I. Soch.: v 6 t. T. 4 (1). M.: Mysl', 1965. S. 297. 
 5. Apresyan R.G. Retsenziya na kn.: Solov'ev Eh.Yu. Kategoricheskij imperativ nravstvennosti i prava//Vopr. filosofii. 2007. № 7. S. 168. 
 6. Apresyan R.G. Kommentarii k diskussii//Logos. 2008. № 5. S. 212.
 7. Kant I. Metafizika nravov//Kant I. Soch.: v 6 t. T. 4(2). M.: Mysl', 1965. S. 366. 
 8. Apresyan R.G. Kommentarii k diskussii... S. 203. 
 9. Artem'eva O.V. Ob opravdannosti lzhi iz chelovekolyubiya//Logos. 2008. № 5. S. 40-59. 
 10. Kant I. Osnovy metafiziki nravstvennosti. S. 302. 
 11. Tam zhe. S. 229. 
 12. Tam zhe. S. 243. 
 13. Apresyan R.G. O prave lgat'//Logos. 2008. № 5. S. 6. 
 14. Artem'eva O.V. Ob opravdannosti lzhi iz chelovekolyubiya // Logos. 2008. № 5. S. 40-59. 
 15. Prokof'ev A.V. Kant, obman, primenenie sily//Logos. 2008. № 5. S. 60-90. 
 16. Kant I. Osnovy metafiziki nravstvennosti. S. 232. 
 17. Tam zhe. S. 268-273. 
 18. Tam zhe. S. 224. 
 19. Kant I. Metafizika nravov... S. 392. 
 20. Tam zhe. S. 329 
 21. Kant I. Ob iznachal'no zlom v chelovecheskoj prirode//Tam zhe. S. 8 
 22. Kant I. Kritika prakticheskogo razuma//Kant I. Soch.: v 6 t. T. 4(1). M.: Mysl', 1965. S. 441-442, 446. 
 23. Kant I. Metafizika nravov. S. 392. 
 24. Tam zhe. S. 324. 
 25. Tam zhe. S. 132-133. 
 26. Tam zhe. S. 416.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate