1. Averincev S.S. Bahtin i russkoe otNshenie k smekhu // Ot mifa k literature: Sbornik v chest' 75-letiya E.M. Meletinskogo [Bakhtin and the Russian attitude to laughter. In the book: from myth to literature. Collection in honr of the 75th anniversary of E. M. Meletinsky]. Moscow, 1993.; Averincev S.S. Bahtin, smekh, hristianskaya kul'tura // M.M. Bahtin kak filosof [Bakhtin, laughter, and Christian culture. In the book: M.M. Bakhtin as a philosopher]. Moscow: Science Publ., 1992.
2. Bahtin M.M. K voprosam teorii smekha. // Sobranie sochinenij v 7 t. T. 5 [To questions about the theory of laughter. Vol. 5. In the collected works in 7 volumes]. Moscow, 1990. P. 49–50.
3. Burenin V.P. Kriticheskie ocherki. Razgovor. T. kn.1 // V.V. Rozanov: pro et contra…. [Critical Essay. ConversatioN In the book: V.V. Rozanov: pro et contra...]. St. Petersburg State University: Publishing house RHGI, 1995.
4. Vevyurko I.S. Septuaginta: drevnegrecheskij tekst Vethogo Zaveta v istorii religioznj mysli [Septuagint: ancient Greek text of the Old Testament in the history of religious thought]. Moscow: Moscow University Press Publ., 2018. P. 944–946.
5. Ioann Zlatoust, svt. Izbrannye tvoreniya. Tolkovanie na svyatogo Matfeya Evangelista: v 2 t. [Selected creations. Interpretation on St. Matthew the Evangelist: in two volumes]. Moscow: Publishing Department of the Moscow Patriarchate Publ., 1993.
6. Losev A.F. Istoriya antichNj estetiki. T. 7. Kn. I, II [History of Ancient Aesthetics. Vol. 7, books 1 and 2]. Moscow: Folio Publ., 2007.
7. Medvedeva A.A. Ponyatie εἰρωνεία v ekzegeticheskom nasledii donikejskogo perioda [The Concept of "εἰρωνεία" in the Exegesis of the pre-Nicean Period]. Religiovedenie. 2019. № 1. P. 5–15.
8. Propp V.Yа. Problemy komizma i smekha. Ritual'nyj smekh v fol'klore (po povodu skazki o Nesmeyane) // Sobranie trudov V.Yа. Proppa. Nauchnaya redakciya, kommentarii Yu.S. Rasskazova [Problems of comic and laughter. Ritual laughter in folklore (on the tales of Nesmeyana). In the book: collected works of V. Yа. Propp. Scientific edition and comments of Yu.S. Rasskazov]. Moscow: Labyrinth Publ., 1999.
9. Sorokin A., archpriest. Hristos i Cerkov' v Nvom Zavete [Christ and the Church in the New Testament]. Moscow: Publishing of Krutitsy Metochion, 2006.
10. Barber M.P. Experiencing Irony in the First Gospel: Suspense, Surprise and Curiosity by Karl McDaniel. Religious Studies Review. 2015. Vol. 41. № 1. P. 24.
11. Berg I.C. Irony in the Matthean Passion narrative. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2014.
12. Boo S. Irony in Mark 4:10-12. The Faculty of Gateway Seminary of the Southern Baptist Convention. Louisville, Kentucky, 2017.
13. Botha J.E. The Case of Johannine Irony Reopened: The Problematic Current Situation. Neotestamentica. 1991. Vol. 25. P. 209–220.
14. Buckley G.V. The Wit and Wisdom of Jesus. Battle Creek, Michigan: Ellis Publishing Co, 1901.
15. Burton S.D. The Irony of Galatians: Paul’s Letter in First-Century Context by Mark D. Nanos. Jewish Book World. 2002. Vol. 20, № 1. P. 31–32.
16. Butler B.J. Irony in the Book of Revelation. Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, Louisville, Kentucky, 1998.
17. Caldwell C.M. Reading the Marcan Passion Narrative in Light of Its Interpretation by Latin American Readers. Baylor University, Waco, Texas, 1997.
18. Camery-Hoggatt J. Irony in the Fourth Gospel by Paul D. Duke. The Journal of Religion. 1987. Vol. 67, № 4. P. 535–536.
19. Camery-Hoggatt J. The Ironic Gospel: An Examination of Marc’s Use of Irony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992; Camery-Hoggatt J. Irony in Mark's Gospel: Text and Subtext. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
20. Chotzner J. Humor and Irony of the Hebrew Bible. Asiatic Quarterly Review, 1892. P. 124–135.
21. Corbin N. The Ironic conflict of faith and doubt in the Gospel of Mark. University of Lincoln. Lincoln, United Kingdom, 2011.
22. Culpepper A. Anatomy of the Fourth Gospel: A Study in Literary Design Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1983.
23. Damm A.L. “Speech Unhindered”: A Study of Irony in the Acts of the Apostles. Wilfrid Laurier University, Ontario, Canada, 1998.
24. Dawsey J.M. The Literary Function of Point of View in Controlling Confusion and Irony in the Gospel of Luke. Emory University. Atlanta, Georgia, 1983; Dawsey J.M. The Lukan Voice: Confusion and Irony in the Gospel of Luke. Macon, Georgia: Mercer University Press, 1986.
25. Duff P.B. The Irony of Galatians Paul's Letter in First-Century Context (Mark D. Nanos). Review. The Journal of Religion. 2002. Vol. 82, № 4. P. 621–622.
26. Duke P.D. Irony in the Fourth Gospel. Atlanta. 1985; Duke P.D. Irony in the Fourth Gospel: the Shape and Function of a Literary Device. The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, Louisville, Kentucky, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 1982.
27. Ellenburg D.A. Review of Selected Narrative-Critical Conventions in Mark’s use of Miracle Material. Journal of Educational Technology and Society. 1995. Vol. 38, № 2. P. 171–180; Ellenburg D.A. An Analysis of the Markan Use of Miracle as Enacted Parable. Mid-America Baptist Theological Seminary, 1993.
28. Feagin G.M. Irony and the kingdom in Mark: A literary-critical study. The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. Louisville, Kentucky: ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 1993; Feagin G.M. Irony and the kingdom in Mark: A literary-critical study. Lewiston, N.Y.: Mellen Biblical Press, 1997.
29. Jonsson J. Humor and irony in the New Testament, illuminated by parallels in Talmud and Midrash. Reykjavík: Bókaútgáfa Menningarsjoðs, 1965; Jonsson J. Humour and Irony in the New Testament. Illuminated by Parallels in Talmud and Midrash. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1985.
30. Ito H. Johannine Irony Demonstrated in John 9: Part I-II. Neotestamentica. 2000. Vol. 34, N 2. P. 361–387.
31. Iverson K. Irony in the End: A Textual and Literary Analysis of Mark. Available at: https://bible.org/article/irony-end-textual-and-literary-analysis-mark-168. Access: 06.06.2018.
32. Kahl B. The Irony of Galatians: Paul's Letter in First-Century Context (Mark D. Nanos). Review. N.Y.: Union Theological Seminary, 2002. P. 200–202.
33. Lee T.Y. Irony in the Gospel of John: Interpreting the Irony in the Nicodemus and the Samaritan Woman Episodes. Singapore: Faculty of the School of Postgraduate Studies Trinity Theological College Singapore, 2012; Lee T.Y. Methodology of Studying Irony in the Gospel of John: A Revisit. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/9871884/Methodology_of_Studying_Irony_in_the_Gospel_of_John_A_Revisit. Access: 06.10.2018.
34. Lusk R. The Ironic Gospel. An Examination of Mark’s Use of Irony. The University of Texas at Austin. Austin, Texas, 1999.
35. MacComb S. The Irony of Christ. The Biblical World. 1904. Vol. 23, N 2. P. 104–109.
36. MacDaniel K. Experiencing Irony in the First Gospel: Suspense, Surprise and Curiosity. L.: Bloomsbury, 2013.
37. Mitchell M.M. Paul and the Irony of Affliction Karl A. Plank. The Journal of Religion. 1988. Vol. 68, № 2. P. 352.
38. Mooney M.D. Myth and irony in the New Testament. University of California, Los Angeles, California, 1993.
39. Nanos M.D. The Irony of Galatians: Paul's Letter in First-Century Context. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Fortress Press, 2002.
40. O' Day G.R. Irony and the Johannine Theology of Revelation: An Investigation of John 4. University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1983.
41. Plank A.K. Paul and the irony of affliction. Atlanta, Georgia: Scholars Press, 1987.
42. Ray J.L. Narrative irony in Luke-Acts. University of Virginia. Charlottesville, Virginia: ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 1991; Ray J.L. Narrative Irony in Luke-Acts. The Paradoxical Interaction of Prophetic Fulfillment and Jewish Rejection. Lewiston, N.Y.: Mellen Biblical Press Series, 1996.
43. Schellenberg R.S. Rethinking Paul’s Rhetorical Education: Comparative Rhetoric and 2 Corinthians 10-13. Society of Biblical Literature. 2013. Vol. 10. P. 34–36, 169–170.
44. Shutter M.D. Wit and Humor of the Bible: A Literary Study. Boston: The Arena Publishing Co, 1893.
45. Smiga G.M. The Irony of Galatians: Paul’s Letter in First-Century Context. Review. Catholic Biblical Quarterly. 2003.Vol. 65. P. 131–133.
46. Stewart Q.D. The Triumph of the Lamb and His Followers Through “Defeat” and “Sacrifice” in St. John's Apocalypse. Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. Chicago, Illinis, 1998.
47. Trueblood E. The Humor of Christ. N.Y.: Harper and Row, 1964.
48. Via D.O. Kerygma and Comedy in the New Testament: A Structuralist Approach to Hermeneutic. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1975.
49. Weaver D.J. Matthew 28:1-10. Interpretation, 1992.Vol. 46, N 4. P. 398–402; Weaver D.J. Power and Powerlessness: Matthew’s Use of Irony in the Portrayal of Political Leaders. Treasures New and Old: Recent Contributions to Matthean Studies. 1996. Vol. 1. P. 182–187; Weaver D.J. “They Did to Him Whatever They Pleased”: The Exercise of Political Power within Matthew’s Narrative. Eastern Mennnite Seminary, Harrisonburg, Virginia, 2008; Weaver D.J. The Irony of Power: The PoliStudies in Peace and Scripture. Institute of Mennite Studies, 2017.
50. Worley D. Dramatic Irony in Jesus' Final Hours. NAD Office of Education, 2008.
Comments
No posts found