Neuro-physiological mechanisms and evolutionary sense of the empathy
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Neuro-physiological mechanisms and evolutionary sense of the empathy
Annotation
PII
S023620070000724-3-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Denis Andreyuk 
Occupation: Associate Professor of marketing, faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University; Member of the Presidium-Executive Director of the Russian Association for the promotion of science; Executive Vice-President of the Nanotechnological Society of Rus
Affiliation:
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Association for the promotion of science
Nanotechnological Society of Russia
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
E. Makhiyanova
Affiliation: Russian Association for the promotion of science
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Edition
Pages
29-39
Abstract

It was that the empathy is an evolutionary acquisition, a useful cognitive tool, that is typical not only for human beings but for other social mammals as well. The assumption is substantiated by some results of anthropologic, neurophysiologic and genetic examinations of some species of social mammals as well as by some extensively developed hypotheses, e.g. “human self-domestication” hypothesis and empathizing–systemizing theory.

Empathy is a conscious understanding of the other person’ emotional and mental state based on the subject’s available set of mental representations and their results — so-called “theory of mind”. To evolve empathy and to develop the extensive theory of mind the period of juvenalization, i.e. preserving of the mental flexibility and plasticity must be long enough. A reduction of intraspecific aggression based on a certain neurophysiologic profile is another necessary precondition. These are the postulates of “human self-domestication” theory. Another hypothesis underlying the theory of human cognitive evolution theory is empathizing–systemizing hypothesis. It links the differences in a persons’ ability to understand mind theories of other persons with the level of the brain masculinization. An extreme level of high systematizing and low empathizing that accompanies autism spectrum disorders is usually attributed to hyper-masculinization of the brain in the time of prenatal development. A number of neurophysiological mechanisms that provide prosocial behavior are described by now. Among “social” hormones there are oxytocin, serotonin, vasopressin.

So the formation of so-called homo co operative or homo social, who is most adapted to efficient social interactions, may be one of the evolutionary vectors. An individual who is “ideal” for co-operation, must have a strong empathy, a developed mind theory, lower brain masculinity, a high level of endogenous oxytocin, a well-developed mirror neuron system or systems, willingness to take risks in order to establish useful links that is reinforced by high level of serotonin (the latter, in particular, provides for aversion from aggression and damaging other people), well-developed cognitive abilities, proclivity for creative solution of social problems.

Keywords
brain neurophysiology, empathy, mentality, cognitive abilities
Received
25.07.2018
Date of publication
30.09.2018
Number of purchasers
10
Views
1771
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
Additional services access
Additional services for the article

Publication text not found

References

1. Baron-Kohen S. Autism: the empathizing4systemizing (E4S) theory // Annals of the New York Academy of Science. 2009. No. 1156. R. 68–80.

2. Brunnlieb C., Nave G., Camerer C. F., et al. Vasopressin increases human risky cooperative behavior // PNAS, 2016. Vol. 113. No. 8. R. 2051–2056

3. Crockett M.J., Clark L., Hauser M.D. et al. Serotonin selectively influences moral judgment and behavior through effects on harm aversion // PNAS, 2010. Vol. 107. No. 40. R. 17433–17438.

4. Hare B., Wobler V., Wrangham R. The self-domestication hypothesis: evolution of bonobo psychology is due to selecting against aggression // Animal Behavior, 2012. No. 83. R. 573–585.

5. Krupenyu K., MacLean E.L., Hare B. Does the bonobo have (a chimpanzee-like) theory of mind? // Bonobos: Unique in mind, brain, and behavior. Editors Hare B., Yamamoto Sh. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.

6. MacLean E.L.Unravelling the Evolution of Uniquely Human Cognition // PNAS, 2016. Vol. 113. No. 23. R. 6348–6354.

7. Okbay A. et al. Genome-wide association study identifies 74 loci associated with educational attainment // Nature. 2016 May 26; 533(7604): 539–542.

8. Rizzolatti G., Sinigaglia C. Mirrors in the Brain: How Our Minds Share Actions, Emotions, and Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

9. Romero T., Nagasawa M., Mogi K., et al. Oxytocin promotes social bonding in dogs // PNAS, 2014. Vol. 111. No. 25.

10. Tomasello M., Melis A.P., Tennie C., Wyman E., Herrmann E. Two key steps in the evolution of human cooperation the interdependence hypothesis // Current Anthropology, 2012. Vol. 53. No. 6. R. 673–692.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate