1. Ariès P. Chelovek pered litsom smerti [L'Homme devant la mort], transl. from French by V.K. Ronin. Moscow: Progress Publ., 1992.
2. Belyaletdinov R.R., Popova O.V., Tishchenko P.D., Shevchenko S.Yu. Bioeticheskiye vyzovy tekhnologiy redaktirovaniya genoma embrionov cheloveka [Bioethical Challenges of Human Genome Editing Technologies in Embryos]. Voprosy Filosofii. 2021. N 5. P. 70–82.
3. Britanok prizyvayut zamorozit' yaytsekletki poka ne pozdno [British women are urged to freeze eggs before it's too late]. MEDNovosti. 2006 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://medportal.ru/mednovosti/britanok-prizyvayut-zamorozit-yaytsekletki-poka-ne-pozdno-91c85ded-75d6-4a32-bfcd-264ac249cba9/ (date of access: 05.11.2021).
4. Vishnevskiy A.G. Demorgrafiya i traditsiya [Demography and tradition]. Demoskop Weekly. 2011. N 473–474. P. 1–26.
5. Grebenshchikova E.G., Andreyuk D.S., Volchkov P.Y., et al. Redaktirovaniye genoma embrionov cheloveka: mezhdistsiplinarnyy podkhod [Human embryo genome editing: an interdisciplinary approach]. Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii meditsinskikh nauk. 2021. Vol. 76. N 1. P. 86–92.
6. Zakharov S.V., Sakevich V.I. Osobennosti planirovaniya sem'i i rozhdayemost' v Rossii: kontratseptivnaya revolyutsiya — svershivshiysya fakt? [Features of family planning and fertility in Russia: the contraceptive revolution is it a fait accompli?]. Roditeli i deti, muzhchiny i zhenshchiny v sem'ye i obshchestve, ed. by T.M. Malevaya, O.V. Sinyavskaya. Moscow: NISP Publ., 2007. P. 127–170.
7. Jonas H. Printsip otvetstvennosti. Opyt etiki tekhnologicheskoy tsivilizatsii [The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age], transl. from German by I.I. Mahan'kov. Moscow: Iris-Press Publ., 2004.
8. Kon I.S. Detstvo kak sotsial'nyy fenomen [Childhood as a social phenomenon]. The Journal of Social Policy Studies. 2010. N 2. P. 151–174.
9. Lekhtsiyer V.L. Meditsina 4P i situatsiya novogo Edipa: ekzistentsial'nyye effekty bioprediktsii. [Medicine 4P and the situation of the new Oedipus: existential effects of bioprediktion]. Rabochiye tetradi po bioetike. Iss. 21: Filosofsko–antropologicheskiye osnovaniya personalizirovannoy meditsiny (mezhdistsiplinarnyy analiz): sb. nauch. st. [Bioethics workbooks. Issue 21: Philosophical and anthropological foundations of personalized medicine (interdisciplinary analysis): collection of scientific articles], ed. by P.D. Tishchenko. Moscow: Moscow University for the Humanities Publ., 2015. P. 137–171.
10. Popova O.V. Chelovek kak artefakt biotekhnologiy [Human as an artifact of biotechnology]. Moscow: Kanon+ ROII Reabilitatsiya Publ., 2017.
11. Rusanova N.E. Gender choice in assisted reproductive technologies: opportunities, dangers, prospects. Narodonaselenie [Population]. 2020. Vol. 23. N 2. P. 125–135.
12. Steering Committee Bioethics (CDBI) Protection of the Human Embryo In Vitro. Report by the Working Party on the Protection of the Human Embryo and Fetus (CDBI-CO-GT3), transl. by L.A. Reznichenko, ed. by B.G. Yudin, L.F. Kurilo. Strasbourg, 2003 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.coe.int/t/dg3/healthbioethic/texts_and_documents/CDBI-CO-GT3 (2003)13E.pdf (date of access: 05.11.2021).
13. Sidorova T.A. Antropologicheskiye riski surrogatnogo roditel'stva [Anthropological risks of surrogate parenting]. Algebra rodstva. Rodstvo. Sistemy rodstva. Sistemy terminov rodstva. Iss. 14, ed. by V.A. Popov. St. Petersburg.: The Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography RAS Publ., 2013. P. 104–120.
14. Habermas J. Budushcheye chelovecheskoy prirody. Na puti k liberal'noy yevgenike [The Future of Human Nature], transl. from German by M. Hor'kov. Moscow: Ves' Mir Publ., 2002.
15. Bostrom N. Human Genetic Enhancements: A Transhumanist Perspective. The Journal of Value Inquiry. N 37. 2003. Р. 493–506.
16. Cavaliere G. Background Paper “The Ethics of Human Genome Editing”. WHO Expert Advisory Committee on Developing Global Standards for Governance and Oversight of Human Genome. London: Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, King’s College London, 2019.
17. Chesterton G.K. Appreciations and Criticisms of the Works of Charles Dickens. London: J. M. Dent & Sons, LTD. New York: E. P. Button & Co. Chapter III “Pickwick Papers”, 1911. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://ia902607.us.archive.org/25/items/appreciations00chesuoft/appreciations00chesuoft.pdf (date of access: 05.11.2021).
18. Duster T. Eugenics. Enzyclopedia of Bioethics. Vol. 1, ed. by Stepen G. Post. New York: Macmillan reference, 2004. Р. 855.
19. Gyngell C., Bowman-Smart H., Savulescu J. Moral reasons to edit the human genome: Picking up from the Nuffield report. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2019. N 45. P. 514–523.
20. Sidorova T. Philosophical analysis of procreation in the value dimension. Population and Economics. 2020. N 4. Р. 57–66.
Comments
No posts found